Screener
BCFN vs ISTB
Baron Financials ETF vs iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- ISTB costs 0.74% less per year.
- ISTB is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCFN is classified as equity, while ISTB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- ISTB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | ISTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $4.7B |
| Since | 2019 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.20% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.78% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -9.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and ISTB
Explore further