Screener
BCFN vs IXG
Baron Financials ETF vs iShares Global Financials ETF
Key differences
- IXG costs 0.39% less per year.
- IXG is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | IXG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $541M |
| Since | 2019 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +16.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.67% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -43.47% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and IXG
Explore further