Screener
BCFN vs SPLB
Baron Financials ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SPLB costs 0.76% less per year.
- SPLB is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCFN is classified as equity, while SPLB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SPLB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | SPLB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 5.39% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.24% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -34.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and SPLB
Explore further