Screener
BCFN vs THLV
Baron Financials ETF vs THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- THLV costs 0.16% less per year.
- BCFN follows a index tracking strategy; THLV uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | THLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $58M |
| Since | 2019 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.95% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -13.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and THLV
Explore further