Screener
BCFN vs VRP
Baron Financials ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- VRP costs 0.30% less per year.
- VRP is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCFN is classified as equity, while VRP is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- VRP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCFN | VRP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2019 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 6.39% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.89% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -46.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCFN and VRP
Explore further