Screener
BCGD vs ASCI
Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF vs abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF
Key differences
Both BCGD and ASCI are equity ETFs. BCGD charges 0.75% a year and ASCI 0.70%. The main difference: BCGD follows a index tracking strategy; ASCI uses active selection.
- BCGD follows a index tracking strategy; ASCI uses active selection.
- BCGD covers global markets; ASCI covers global markets excluding the US.
- ASCI costs 0.05% less per year.
- ASCI is much larger than BCGD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASCI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCGD | ASCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $82M |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.78% | -11.22% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.