Screener
BCHP vs CGIC
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF vs Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGIC is significantly larger than BCHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCHP follows a index tracking strategy; CGIC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCHP | CGIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.4% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.85% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -18.56% | -13.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCHP and CGIC
Explore further