Screener
BCHP vs EPSV
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF vs Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- BCHP costs 0.30% less per year.
- BCHP is significantly larger than EPSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCHP covers global markets; EPSV covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCHP | EPSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $5M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.4% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.85% | 17.79% |
| Max drawdown | -18.56% | -8.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCHP and EPSV
Explore further