Screener
BCHP vs FFLV
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap
Key differences
- FFLV costs 0.20% less per year.
- BCHP is significantly larger than FFLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCHP follows a index tracking strategy; FFLV uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCHP | FFLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $17M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.4% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.85% | 11.50% |
| Max drawdown | -18.56% | -16.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCHP and FFLV
Explore further