Screener
BCHP vs TGRW
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF vs T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
Key differences
- TGRW costs 0.06% less per year.
- TGRW is significantly larger than BCHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCHP covers global markets; TGRW covers north america.
- BCHP follows a index tracking strategy; TGRW uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCHP | TGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $972M |
| Since | 2023 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.4% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.85% | 16.62% |
| Max drawdown | -18.56% | -43.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCHP and TGRW
Explore further