Screener
BCLO vs ICLO
iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF vs Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF
Key differences
- ICLO costs 0.26% less per year.
- ICLO is significantly larger than BCLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCLO | ICLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $74M | $448M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 6.76% | 5.26% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.4% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.12% | 1.38% |
| Max drawdown | -4.46% | -3.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCLO and ICLO
Explore further