Screener
BCSM vs FLRG
Baron SMID Cap ETF vs Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
Key differences
Both BCSM and FLRG are equity ETFs. BCSM charges 0.75% a year and FLRG 0.15%. The main difference: BCSM follows a active selection strategy; FLRG uses index tracking.
- BCSM follows a active selection strategy; FLRG uses index tracking.
- FLRG costs 0.60% less per year.
- FLRG is much larger than BCSM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLRG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCSM | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $32M | $292M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +14.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.38% |
| Max drawdown | -17.45% | -19.64% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.