Screener
BCSM vs ILCV
Baron SMID Cap ETF vs iShares Morningstar Value ETF
Key differences
- ILCV costs 0.71% less per year.
- ILCV is significantly larger than BCSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ILCV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCSM | ILCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.94% |
| Max drawdown | -17.45% | -35.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCSM and ILCV
Explore further