Screener
BCSM vs SCHM
Baron SMID Cap ETF vs Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCHM costs 0.71% less per year.
- SCHM is significantly larger than BCSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCSM | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $14.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.72% |
| Max drawdown | -17.45% | -42.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCSM and SCHM
Explore further