Screener
BCSM vs SMMD
Baron SMID Cap ETF vs iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Key differences
- SMMD costs 0.60% less per year.
- SMMD is significantly larger than BCSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMMD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCSM | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +36.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -17.45% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCSM and SMMD
Explore further