Screener
BCTK vs CQQQ
Baron Technology ETF vs Invesco China Technology ETF
Key differences
- CQQQ costs 0.10% less per year.
- CQQQ is significantly larger than BCTK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CQQQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCTK | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $165M | $2.7B |
| Since | 2021 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -6.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 29.76% |
| Max drawdown | -13.96% | -73.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BCTK and CQQQ
Explore further