Screener
BDGS vs CGSD
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF vs Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
- CGSD costs 0.62% less per year.
- CGSD is significantly larger than BDGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BDGS is classified as equity, while CGSD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, BDGS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDGS | CGSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.87% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.53% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.06% | 1.46% |
| Max drawdown | -9.12% | -1.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDGS and CGSD
Explore further