Screener
BDGS vs SAMT
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- SAMT costs 0.21% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than BDGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BDGS is classified as equity, while SAMT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BDGS follows a active selection strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDGS | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.87% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $619M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.53% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +46.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | +28.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 1.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.06% | 16.65% |
| Max drawdown | -9.12% | -20.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDGS and SAMT
Explore further