Screener
BDVL vs SPDF
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF vs Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF
Key differences
- BDVL costs 0.29% less per year.
- BDVL is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BDVL is classified as mixed asset, while SPDF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BDVL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDVL | SPDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $5M |
| Since | 2017 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 2.96% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -7.71% | -1.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDVL and SPDF
Explore further