Screener
BDVL vs XMLV
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- XMLV costs 0.15% less per year.
- BDVL is classified as mixed asset, while XMLV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BDVL follows a active selection strategy; XMLV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDVL | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $750M |
| Since | 2017 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.96% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.64 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.33% |
| Max drawdown | -7.71% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDVL and XMLV
Explore further