Screener
BDYN vs BILT
iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF vs iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
Key differences
- BDYN costs 0.20% less per year.
- BDYN is significantly larger than BILT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BDYN is classified as mixed asset, while BILT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BDYN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDYN | BILT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $26M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -10.85% | -5.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDYN and BILT
Explore further