Screener
BDYN vs CWS
iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF vs AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
Key differences
- BDYN costs 0.25% less per year.
- BDYN is significantly larger than CWS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BDYN is classified as mixed asset, while CWS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDYN | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $155M |
| Since | 2017 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 0.31% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +1.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.35% |
| Max drawdown | -10.85% | -33.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDYN and CWS
Explore further