Screener
BDYN vs FORH
iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF vs Formidable ETF
Key differences
- BDYN costs 0.79% less per year.
- BDYN is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BDYN is classified as mixed asset, while FORH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BDYN follows a active selection strategy; FORH uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDYN | FORH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 1.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $20M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.66% |
| Max drawdown | -10.85% | -20.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDYN and FORH
Explore further