Screener
BDYN vs MFSI
iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF vs MFS Active International ETF
Key differences
- BDYN costs 0.19% less per year.
- BDYN is classified as mixed asset, while MFSI is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BDYN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDYN | MFSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $1.0B |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 0.79% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +18.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.66% |
| Max drawdown | -10.85% | -13.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BDYN and MFSI
Explore further