Screener
BDYN vs SCUB
iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF vs Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCUB costs 0.10% less per year.
- BDYN is significantly larger than SCUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BDYN is classified as mixed asset, while SCUB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SCUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BDYN | SCUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $25M |
| Since | 2017 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -10.85% | -0.16% |
Similar to BDYN and SCUB
Explore further