Screener
BEDZ vs CWS
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF vs AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
Key differences
- CWS costs 0.34% less per year.
- CWS is significantly larger than BEDZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BEDZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BEDZ | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $155M |
| Since | 2021 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.28% | 0.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +1.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.56 | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.46% | 13.35% |
| Max drawdown | -29.70% | -33.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BEDZ and CWS
Explore further