Screener
BEDZ vs RXI
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF vs iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF
Key differences
- RXI costs 0.60% less per year.
- RXI is significantly larger than BEDZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BEDZ follows a active selection strategy; RXI uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BEDZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RXI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BEDZ | RXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $268M |
| Since | 2021 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.28% | 1.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +9.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +12.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.56 | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.46% | 16.44% |
| Max drawdown | -29.70% | -35.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BEDZ and RXI
Explore further