Screener
BEDZ vs XLP
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF vs State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
Key differences
- XLP costs 0.91% less per year.
- XLP is significantly larger than BEDZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BEDZ follows a active selection strategy; XLP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BEDZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BEDZ | XLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $14.5B |
| Since | 2021 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 2.28% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.56 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.46% | 12.56% |
| Max drawdown | -29.70% | -24.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BEDZ and XLP
Explore further