Screener
BELT vs DYNF
iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- DYNF costs 0.49% less per year.
- DYNF is significantly larger than BELT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BELT follows a index enhanced strategy; DYNF uses active selection.
- DYNF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BELT | DYNF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $34.0B |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.21% | 12.60% |
| Max drawdown | -23.05% | -34.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BELT and DYNF
Explore further