Screener
BETZ vs CHAT
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF vs Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
Key differences
- CHAT is significantly larger than BETZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BETZ follows a index tracking strategy; CHAT uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CHAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BETZ | CHAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2020 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.96% | 2.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -7.7% | +132.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.4% | +55.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -7.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | 1.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.37% | 30.53% |
| Max drawdown | -60.82% | -31.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BETZ and CHAT
Explore further