Screener
BETZ vs IPAY
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF vs Amplify Digital Payments ETF
Key differences
- IPAY is significantly larger than BETZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BETZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IPAY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BETZ | IPAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $174M |
| Since | 2020 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 4.96% | 0.87% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -7.7% | -18.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.4% | +3.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -7.7% | -7.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.37% | 23.27% |
| Max drawdown | -60.82% | -51.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BETZ and IPAY
Explore further