Screener
BETZ vs UNHW
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF vs Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
Key differences
- BETZ costs 0.24% less per year.
- BETZ is significantly larger than UNHW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BETZ is classified as equity, while UNHW is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BETZ follows a index tracking strategy; UNHW uses leveraged.
- BETZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BETZ | UNHW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $4M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.96% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -7.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -7.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.37% | — |
| Max drawdown | -60.82% | -32.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BETZ and UNHW
Explore further