Screener
BFIX vs ADME
Build Bond Innovation ETF vs Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
Key differences
BFIX is a fixed income ETF, while ADME is an alternative ETF. BFIX charges 0.45% a year and ADME 0.79%.
- BFIX is a fixed income fund, while ADME is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- BFIX costs 0.34% less per year.
- ADME is much larger than BFIX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ADME has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ADME has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFIX | ADME | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $280M |
| Since | 2022 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.52% | 0.37% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.7% | +16.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.88% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -8.03% | -27.49% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.