Screener
BFIX vs AGG
Build Bond Innovation ETF vs iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
- AGG costs 0.42% less per year.
- AGG is significantly larger than BFIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFIX is classified as alternative, while AGG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BFIX follows a option income strategy; AGG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BFIX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AGG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFIX | AGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $135.4B |
| Since | 2022 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 3.95% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.7% | +3.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.90% | 3.90% |
| Max drawdown | -8.03% | -18.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFIX and AGG
Explore further