Screener
BFIX vs AGZ
Build Bond Innovation ETF vs iShares Agency Bond ETF
Key differences
- AGZ costs 0.25% less per year.
- AGZ is significantly larger than BFIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFIX is classified as alternative, while AGZ is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BFIX follows a option income strategy; AGZ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BFIX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AGZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFIX | AGZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $552M |
| Since | 2022 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 3.75% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +4.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.7% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.90% | 2.61% |
| Max drawdown | -8.03% | -11.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFIX and AGZ
Explore further