Screener
BFIX vs APCB
Build Bond Innovation ETF vs ActivePassive Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- APCB costs 0.09% less per year.
- APCB is significantly larger than BFIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFIX is classified as alternative, while APCB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BFIX follows a option income strategy; APCB uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BFIX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFIX | APCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $919M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 4.15% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.7% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.90% | 3.47% |
| Max drawdown | -8.03% | -6.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFIX and APCB
Explore further