Screener
BFIX vs GTO
Build Bond Innovation ETF vs Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
Key differences
- GTO costs 0.10% less per year.
- GTO is significantly larger than BFIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFIX is classified as alternative, while GTO is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BFIX follows a option income strategy; GTO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BFIX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GTO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFIX | GTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.7% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.90% | 3.47% |
| Max drawdown | -8.03% | -20.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFIX and GTO
Explore further