Screener
BFIX vs HYDB
Build Bond Innovation ETF vs iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- HYDB costs 0.10% less per year.
- HYDB is significantly larger than BFIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFIX is classified as alternative, while HYDB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BFIX follows a option income strategy; HYDB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, HYDB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HYDB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFIX | HYDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 7.11% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.7% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.90% | 3.82% |
| Max drawdown | -8.03% | -21.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFIX and HYDB
Explore further