Screener
BFIX vs IGSB
Build Bond Innovation ETF vs iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- IGSB costs 0.41% less per year.
- IGSB is significantly larger than BFIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFIX is classified as alternative, while IGSB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BFIX follows a option income strategy; IGSB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BFIX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGSB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFIX | IGSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $21.9B |
| Since | 2022 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 4.53% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.7% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.90% | 1.94% |
| Max drawdown | -8.03% | -13.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFIX and IGSB
Explore further