Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BFLX vs DGRO

iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF vs iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

BFLX

iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$11M

DGRO

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

Annual cost

0.08%

Fund size

$40.5B

Key differences

Both BFLX and DGRO are equity ETFs. BFLX charges 0.40% a year and DGRO 0.08%. The main difference: BFLX follows a active selection strategy; DGRO uses index tracking.

  • BFLX follows a active selection strategy; DGRO uses index tracking.
  • BFLX covers global markets; DGRO covers North America.
  • DGRO costs 0.32% less per year.
  • DGRO is much larger than BFLX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • DGRO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BFLXDGRO
Annual cost (TER)0.40%0.08%
Fund size (AUM)$11M$40.5B
Since20262014
Dividend yield1.96%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1YN/A+22.9%
CAGR 3YN/A+18.0%
CAGR 5YN/A+10.6%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.16
Volatility 1Y9.52%
Max drawdown-2.56%-35.10%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to BFLX and DGRO