Screener
BFLX vs SCUB
iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF vs Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCUB costs 0.10% less per year.
- BFLX is classified as equity, while SCUB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BFLX covers global markets; SCUB covers north america.
- SCUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFLX | SCUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $25M |
| Since | 2026 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.92% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -0.31% | -0.16% |
Similar to BFLX and SCUB
Explore further