Screener
BFOR vs CGGO
Barron's 400 ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.18% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than BFOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFOR covers north america markets; CGGO covers global.
- BFOR follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- BFOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2013 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 16.59% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and CGGO
Explore further