Screener
BFOR vs FLRG
Barron's 400 ETF vs Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FLRG costs 0.50% less per year.
- BFOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $283M |
| Since | 2013 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +19.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 10.28% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -19.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and FLRG
Explore further