Screener
BFOR vs IJT
Barron's 400 ETF vs iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IJT costs 0.47% less per year.
- IJT is significantly larger than BFOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BFOR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IJT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | IJT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $7.3B |
| Since | 2013 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.96% | 17.73% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -42.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and IJT
Explore further