Screener
BFOR vs MANI
Barron's 400 ETF vs Man Active Income ETF
Key differences
- BFOR is classified as equity, while MANI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BFOR covers north america markets; MANI covers emerging markets.
- BFOR follows a index tracking strategy; MANI uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | MANI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | — |
| Since | 2013 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | — |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -0.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and MANI
Explore further