Screener
BFOR vs RPV
Barron's 400 ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- RPV costs 0.30% less per year.
- RPV is significantly larger than BFOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BFOR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RPV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | RPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2013 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 2.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.96% | 12.76% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -50.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and RPV
Explore further