Screener
BFOR vs VO
Barron's 400 ETF vs Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VO costs 0.62% less per year.
- VO is significantly larger than BFOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BFOR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $213.8B |
| Since | 2013 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 12.42% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -39.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and VO
Explore further