Screener
BGRN vs EAGG
iShares USD Green Bond ETF vs iShares ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
- EAGG costs 0.10% less per year.
- EAGG is significantly larger than BGRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BGRN covers global markets; EAGG covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, BGRN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BGRN | EAGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $470M | $4.7B |
| Since | 2018 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.25% | 3.97% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.5% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.6% | +0.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 0.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.04% | 3.83% |
| Max drawdown | -19.16% | -18.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BGRN and EAGG
Explore further