Screener
BGRO vs CAML
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- BGRO costs 0.10% less per year.
- CAML is significantly larger than BGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BGRO is classified as alternative, while CAML is equity — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| BGRO | CAML | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $376M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +15.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.04% | 14.65% |
| Max drawdown | -24.94% | -21.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BGRO and CAML
Explore further