Screener
BGRO vs GSGO
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- GSGO costs 0.10% less per year.
- GSGO is significantly larger than BGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BGRO is classified as alternative, while GSGO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BGRO | GSGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $163M |
| Since | 2024 | 1999 |
| Dividend yield | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.04% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.94% | -13.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BGRO and GSGO
Explore further